The thesis

The wealth
is already here.

Knowledge. Trust. Creativity. Skills. Relationships. Every community holds a wealth of possibility. What would help more of it become productive?

Coordination changes what is possible.

Creating something together takes work beyond the activity itself. Finding collaborators, remembering decisions, keeping commitments visible and agreeing how to share results all require coordination.

Large organizations have historically had more resources to do that work. AI and shared software may lower the cost, helping smaller groups operate with greater continuity and capability.

What if a small community could have the capacity of a sophisticated organization?

From shared resources to shared production.

A Commons can preserve something valuable. It can also help people create something new: a service, a product, useful knowledge or a recurring local opportunity.

Wealth of Commons focuses on productive economic communities. Participants bring different capabilities, organize around a purpose and agree how to participate in the value they create. This includes new ventures and existing businesses supported by communities of customers, creators, practitioners or partners. Community participation does not prescribe ownership; each business chooses arrangements that fit its people and purpose.

An idea with a long conversation behind it.

The thesis draws on Adam Smith’s account of specialization, Ronald Coase’s work on coordination costs, Elinor Ostrom’s research into community governance and Yochai Benkler’s work on networked production. Cooperative traditions and collective-intelligence research also inform the inquiry.

The question we want to explore in practice is what these ideas make possible when people and AI agents can remember, coordinate and act together.

Make contributions visible. Decide what follows.

An introduction can matter. So can useful knowledge, time, a trusted relationship or a piece of software. Recording contributions gives participants better information; it does not automatically tell them what a fair arrangement is.

Governance, attribution and economic participation remain design choices. Communities need to work through those choices, including how to resolve disagreement and how to invest in their future.

One platform. A particular purpose.

Opentangle is the general-purpose platform for persistent organizations of people and AI agents. Wealth of Commons is an Org with a specific mission: help create, grow and connect productive Commons.

WoC provides organizational intelligence for community-powered businesses. An Org connects people, AI, knowledge and resources around a shared purpose. Its Org Chief helps coordinate that work; participants decide the direction and the authority they delegate.

Each Commons can operate through its own Org with its own rules and Org Chief. It can collaborate with other Commons while retaining its purpose and community governance.

A thesis to test through real work.

Can smaller communities coordinate effectively? Can they create something people need? Can participants share in the outcome on terms they understand?

The book develops the thesis. The WoC Org is an operating experiment. Individual Commons are where these ideas must prove useful. We will learn from what actually happens.

Background essays

The intellectual foundations of Wealth of Commons

Clarifying Opentangle and Wealth of Commons

A new venture. An existing business. A community ready to build.

The people. The ideas.
The possibility.

Start with what your community has.
Let’s explore the business you could build together.

Start a Commons